|
Hi Kenneth,
Well crafted, tad sentimental but I think in a way that helps the poem, especially since we are seeing this from the 10 year old's point of view. In addition to what Bernie has pointed out, the couple of problems I am having with this piece has to do with the prolonged scene-setting in S1 and S2 and the cynical interruption in the dream (if you will) in S3 (L2 and 3). Please consider the following suggests in-lined:
Whenever someone came up missing in our town, folks were quick to blame the river. The men would [load up whiskey and grappling hooks into john boats;] drag that stretch from Looking Glass Falls to the spillway {consider lb} where a man could roil a week and not be found.
They'd prod the banks with bamboo where Pop said catfish big as a boy laid in under [there] [and fed] (feeding) off what the river didn't swallow. Sometimes they'd snag a body; sometimes they'd say: "Nothing we can do now unless a flood comes."
When I was ten, the river took my Mama. [Least that's what Pop says anyway- the truth doesn't matter.]
All that summer me and my little brother rode our bikes down to where we imagined she went under; tossed in wild flowers we picked along the way, shoved each other and made jokes about fish food.
Maybe this spring or the next when the rains come [and the water slips its banks dark and beautiful as a child running] barefoot through new-sown fields, the river will float her free.
In summary, I think, for this piece to work, it is important the reader sees the narrative unfold through the ten year olds' eyes (as it currently does, barring the brief interjection of an unknown new voice in S3). I like the latent narrative, in how the narrative introduces the brother and would like to see more of that aspect explored; to get a whiff of the world as seen by the brother, who, although present, is a shadow, far removed from the thick of the narrative.
Enjoyed, none the same. Regards. Sachi
|